This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFC-2] Handle GPC specific name for main function

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
To: "Pierre Muller" <muller at ics dot u-strasbg dot fr>
Cc: muller at ics dot u-strasbg dot fr, brobecker at adacore dot com, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org, gpc at gnu dot de
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 09:20:25 +0200
Subject: Re: [RFC-2] Handle GPC specific name for main function
References: <003901c8004b$2f9a55d0$8ecf0170$@u-strasbg.fr> <20070926175805.GA6208@adacore.com> <001501c80074$ff05ddc0$fd119940$@u-strasbg.fr> <20070926194950.GA21242@adacore.com> <000701c80089$815378f0$83fa6ad0$@u-strasbg.fr> <000801c8008e$0aa12c70$1fe38550$@u-strasbg.fr>
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>

> From: "Pierre Muller" <muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr>
> Cc: <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>,
> 	<gpc@gnu.de>
> Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 00:39:03 +0200
> 
>   Eli, I added a comment in p-lang.c
> that is not really conform to standards, but 
> the whole file uses similar comments.
> Should I reformat them? In a separate patch?

Yes, please.

References:
- [RFC] Handle GPC specific name for main function
  - From: Pierre Muller
- Re: [RFC] Handle GPC specific name for main function
  - From: Joel Brobecker
- RE: [RFC] Handle GPC specific name for main function
  - From: Pierre Muller
- Re: [RFC] Handle GPC specific name for main function
  - From: Joel Brobecker
- RE: [RFC] Handle GPC specific name for main function
  - From: Pierre Muller
- [RFC-2] Handle GPC specific name for main function
  - From: Pierre Muller

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]