This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
> In C, it would be "my_page_var.mapping". The union is transparent.
Oh, I see. (love to learn new things :).
Back to the issue at hand, it therefore seems pretty desirable to
enhance the debugger in that case. Unfortunately, I don't think
the proposed patch is correct, because it bases the logic on the
size of the union/struct instead of whether the field is anonymous
or not. Do you agree?
Just for easier reference, the patch was:
2007-08-16 Carlos Eduardo Seo <cseo@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
gdb/c-typeprint.c (c_type_print_base): check value of
TYPE_NFIELDS (type) when displaying members of an
unnamed struct inside an union.
This patch breaks the tests that I just posted for RFA:
http://www.sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2007-08/msg00498.html
But otherwise is reported to not cause any other regression on
the testsuite.
--
Joel
Attachment:
ptype_issue.diff
Description: Text document
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |