This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch] "single step" atomic instruction sequences as a whole.

From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
To: Luis Machado <luisgpm at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com>
Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org, Ulrich dot Weigand at de dot ibm dot com
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 08:58:50 -0400
Subject: Re: [patch] "single step" atomic instruction sequences as a whole.
References: <1173997454.4772.27.camel@localhost> <20070410204010.GB2056@caradoc.them.org> <1176379764.4434.16.camel@localhost> <20070412121528.GA11412@caradoc.them.org> <1176382440.4434.23.camel@localhost>

On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 09:53:59AM -0300, Luis Machado wrote:
> +# A return value of 1 means that the software_single_step breakpoints 
> +# where inserted; 0 means they where not.

Sorry, two little things: "were" instead of "where", and you need to
rerun gdbarch.sh after changing it (this comment didn't get added to
gdbarch.c).

With those, the patch is OK to commit.  Ulrich, I guess you should do
it since Luis is with IBM?

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch] "single step" atomic instruction sequences as a whole.
  - From: Luis Machado

References:
- Re: [patch] "single step" atomic instruction sequences as a whole.
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: [patch] "single step" atomic instruction sequences as a whole.
  - From: Luis Machado
- Re: [patch] "single step" atomic instruction sequences as a whole.
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: [patch] "single step" atomic instruction sequences as a whole.
  - From: Luis Machado

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]