This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] (not) disassembling power[456] instructions in GDB


On Wed, 2007-01-31 at 22:22 -0200, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
> Comments? Can this patch be applied?

Sorry, I forgot to tag this message as [PATCH], and I also forgot to
mention that I ran the testsuite with no regressions on a power5
machine:

               === gdb tests ===
@@ -180,7 +181,6 @@
 Running ../.././gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/mips_pro.exp ...
 Running ../.././gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/miscexprs.exp ...
 Running ../.././gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/multi-forks.exp ...
-FAIL: gdb.base/multi-forks.exp: follow parent, print pids
 Running ../.././gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/nodebug.exp ...
 Running ../.././gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/opaque.exp ...
 Running ../.././gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/overlays.exp ...
@@ -694,14 +694,14 @@

                === gdb Summary ===

-# of expected passes           10845
-# of unexpected failures       305
+# of expected passes           10846
+# of unexpected failures       304
 # of expected failures         41
 # of known failures            63
 # of unresolved testcases      13
 # of untested testcases                4
 # of unsupported tests         11
-/home/bauermann/gdb-6.6.orig/gdb/testsuite/../../gdb/gdb version  6.6
-nx
+/home/bauermann/gdb-6.6.patched/gdb/testsuite/../../gdb/gdb version
6.6 -nx

I don't think that the FAIL which went away is related to my patch, BTW.
-- 
[]'s
Thiago Jung Bauermann
Software Engineer
IBM Linux Technology Center


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]