This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [patch RFC] Re: Notes on a frame_unwind_address_in_block problem
> Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 17:02:24 -0500
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
>
> On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 10:58:25PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Heh, well, if you do the mechanical frame_unwind_address_in_block()
> > changes I'll do frame_func_unwind().
> >
> > After that we can actually worry about about fixing things.
> >
> > Deal?
>
> Absolutely. If you can hand me a patch which adds NORMAL_FRAME to
> every call to frame_func_unwind, I'll do all the rest. I'm pretty
> sure all of the existing call sites are NORMAL_FRAME; there won't be a
> SIGTRAMP_FRAME one until we split out two this_id functions for dwarf2.
>
> I've got frame_unwind_address_in_block done locally.
Hmm, well, you need to commit that one first, because the
frame_func_unwind() change will depend on it.
But perhaps we should give people a few days to comment...
Mark