This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: RFC: Warning fixes

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
Cc: mark dot kettenis at xs4all dot nl, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 14:15:01 +0200
Subject: Re: RFC: Warning fixes
References: <20061228195828.GA18628@nevyn.them.org> <200612282256.kBSMu65R022410@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20061228230925.GA23775@nevyn.them.org>
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>

> Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:09:26 -0500
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> 
> The warning is a bit annoying, though.  We can't portably tell whether
> the type of sig will be signed or unsigned.  Perhaps we should force
> sig to be an int before bounds checking, instead, and I should file a
> GCC bug report.  How's that sound to you?

A GCC bug report is in order, I agree: the compiler shouldn't punish
the programmer for its choice of data type.

References:
- RFC: Warning fixes
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: RFC: Warning fixes
  - From: Mark Kettenis
- Re: RFC: Warning fixes
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]