This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: MI: fix base members in references
- From: Nick Roberts <nickrob at snap dot net dot nz>
- To: Vladimir Prus <ghost at cs dot msu dot su>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 10:22:16 +1300
- Subject: Re: MI: fix base members in references
> > The patch below seems to fix it for me. Its a diff on 1.63 _with_ your
> > yet to be committed changes.
> I would have preferred if instead of adding if, the code was modified to
> look at
> value_type (var->value)
> as opposed to
I'm not sure that I follow your point. The patch just gets the target type,
after dereferencing, in the case of a pointer.
> The latter is the type of the varobj expression as it is in source program.
> The former is the value we're actually showing. It makes sense to use
> value_type (var->value) for all presentation purposes.
The former appears to be a type also (not a value).
> > Since we have been the only two people directly contributing to for a
> > while now MI, and as it would stop the patches piling up, perhaps Vladimir
> > (if
> > interested)
> I don't very well understand maintainership structure in gdb, but I would
> surely appreciate a permission to commit MI patches directly.
Well it also carries the responsibility of reviewing other peoples patches :-)