This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH] MI: -var-update bug
> Randomisation isn't even the issue - I think that what you've got now
> is simply an accident, and varobjs associated with a particular frame
> should not become valid if a similar looking frame reappears later.
OK that shows I've misunderstood. I thought it was looking for a frame
to associate with it.
> Right now we never delete varobjs automatically. We could preserve
> that, but set a flag on the varobjs indicating they're permanently out
> of scope?
What value is a variable object that is permanently out of scope?
--
Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob