This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
Hi,
`x/x $ebx' on gdb/amd64 debugging inferior/i386 causes Cannot access memory at
address 0xffffce70 (or so) as $ebx is considered `int' and sign-extended to
64-bit while the resulting address 0xffffffffffffce70 fails to be accessed.
$esp does not exhibit this problem as it is `builtin_type_void_data_ptr' not
`builtin_type_int' as $ebx is. Therefore it gets extended as unsigned.
Simulate the part of paddress(); it is questionable how deep in the functions
calling stack the address width cut should be.
Regards,
Jan
As bugreported by John Reiser <jreiser(at)BitWagon.com>:
When debugging a 32-bit executable on x86_64, gdb does not allow examining the stack if pointed to by a non-$esp register. For example,
-----foo.S
_start: .globl _start
nop
int3
movl %esp,%ebx
int3 # examining memory from $ebx fails, from $esp succeeds
nop
nop
-----
$ gcc -m32 -o foo -nostartfiles -nostdlib foo.S
$ gdb foo
Program received signal SIGTRAP, Trace/breakpoint trap.
0x08048076 in _start ()
(gdb) x/i $pc
0x8048076 <_start+2>: mov %esp,%ebx
(gdb) stepi
0x08048078 in _start ()
(gdb) x/x $esp
0xffffce70: 0x00000001
(gdb) x/x $ebx
0xffffce70: Cannot access memory at address 0xffffce70
(gdb) x/x 0xffffce70
0xffffce70: 0x00000001
Expected Results: "x/x $ebx" should have succeeded, too, when %ebx has the
same value as %esp and examining from $esp works.
Attachment:
gdb-6.5-memory-address-width.patch
Description: Text document
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |