This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] zero-terminate result of target_read_alloc


> Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 18:25:46 -0400
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> 
> On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 11:51:24PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > > Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 18:00:43 -0400
> > > From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> > > 
> > > All right!  Compromise and progress!  Thanks, Mark.
> > > 
> > > How about this patch (untested so far)?  My only concern is that it
> > > doesn't report error/unsupported separately from empty; but for all the
> > > uses I know of so far, that's not a problem, and we can change it later
> > > if we need to.
> > 
> > Better get this right from the start, and return xstrdup("") for
> > "empty".  Also the error message
> 
> ... Why didn't I think of that?  Brilliant!
> 
> > "... contained unexpected zero bytes"
> > 
> > is not very clear; the first time I thought that would warn about
> > returning an empty string.  How about changing that to
> > 
> > "... contained unexpected null characters"
> > 
> > ?  
> > 
> > The C standard uses the term "null character" for a byte with all bits
> > set to 0.
> 
> That works for me.  OK with those changes?

Sure


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]