This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: RFC: Remote "qSupported" features probe

From: Nathan Sidwell <nathan at codesourcery dot com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 09:42:37 +0100
Subject: Re: RFC: Remote "qSupported" features probe
References: <20060612195313.GA11276@nevyn.them.org>

Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:

Comments?  Questions?  Otherwise, I will plan to commit this in a week.
I haven't seen any objections to the latest version of the proposal,
although I'm somewhat suspicious that I've just talked everyone else
into the ground.

Can you clarify something for me? If a stub recieves a 'qSupported:foo' packet, should it still respond with any default information it might have -- such as the PacketSize response? Or should such default responses only be sent for an unadorned qSupported packet?

nathan

--
Nathan Sidwell    ::   http://www.codesourcery.com   ::         CodeSourcery
nathan@codesourcery.com    ::     http://www.planetfall.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFC: Remote "qSupported" features probe
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

References:
- RFC: Remote "qSupported" features probe
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]