This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: New branch [was Re: RFC: MI output during program execution]
- From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
- To: Nick Roberts <nickrob at snap dot net dot nz>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 13:14:22 +0300
- Subject: Re: New branch [was Re: RFC: MI output during program execution]
- References: <17458.60694.135878.624750@farnswood.snap.net.nz> <20060404220637.GA12064@nevyn.them.org> <17486.36188.127822.347550@farnswood.snap.net.nz> <20060504150414.GE32605@nevyn.them.org> <17508.18716.564160.93092@farnswood.snap.net.nz> <20060512124331.GA3460@nevyn.them.org> <17510.34460.791254.936961@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <uy7x65n5m.fsf@gnu.org> <17510.62647.981723.46175@kahikatea.snap.net.nz>
- Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
> From: Nick Roberts <nickrob@snap.net.nz>
> Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 21:13:27 +1200
> Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
>
> > You said at some point that manual changes are on your todo, but the
> > TODO file you sent doesn't mention that. Please make sure the manual
> > changes are eventually included, because otherwise I will object to
> > merging this branch onto HEAD. TIA.
>
> Sorry, I meant it was on my todo list (lower case). AFAIK Daniel was talking
> about changing gdb+dejagnu to just gdb in gdbint.texi. I was just saying
> I hadn't forgotten that.
So does this mean you don't plan on modifying the manual to reflect
the changes on the async branch?