This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: RFA: Support Windows extended error numbers in safe_strerror


On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 12:16:02AM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> I always understood having two different versions of a DLL with the
> same name as being the "DLL hell" problem.  Am I wrong?  I can't
> believe that in the last 10 years that people have been talking about
> this problem, MicroSoft didn't come up with a solution for it.  And
> even if they didn't, the solution is simple: just ship the Cygwin
> DLL's under a different name.  Or just link the Cygwin code
> statically.  Or is that impossible on Windows?

My understanding is that this is incompatible with the design of
Cygwin, and e.g. the mechanisms it uses to manage "emulated"
inter-process resources that don't map obviously onto Windows.
Like character devices and TTYs, to give some relevant examples.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]