This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [ob] More warnings; Call for assistance


> Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 18:06:41 -0500
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> 
> > > avoid the use of standard printf
> > 
> > Avoid? how? are you saying that we should write our own version of
> > printf?
> 
> Certainly we shouldn't write a new one - but the advantage of being a
> GNU project and licensed under the GPL is that there's already at least
> two we can choose from, probably more :-)

Doing so would probably get us also the possible bugs of those
implementations, but that's a minor issue.

A more important issue is how do we convince ourselves that the
implementation we use does not blow up in some cases as well, just in
different ones?  `printf' implementations are traditionally reckless
about bad format strings.  Are the ones you suggest any better?


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]