This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH] add 'rs6000_in_function_epilogue_p()' (Revised)
- From: Paul Gilliam <pgilliam at us dot ibm dot com>
- To: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Cc: Kevin Buettner <kevinb at redhat dot com>, Mark Kettenis <mark dot kettenis at xs4all dot nl>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 15:11:27 -0800
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] add 'rs6000_in_function_epilogue_p()' (Revised)
- References: <200511301225.56802.pgilliam@us.ibm.com> <20051202133250.10d687bd@ironwood.lan> <200601111013.24433.pgilliam@us.ibm.com>
- Reply-to: pgilliam at us dot ibm dot com
I see that I had not incorporated Kevin's last set of comments.
Let me do that and post again....
-=# Paul #=-
On Wednesday 11 January 2006 10:13, Paul Gilliam wrote:
> Kevin and Mark,
>
> I kind of lost track of this. Here is a link to the revised patch. It should address Mark's concerns,
> but I thought, sense it's been a while, I should run it by you again.
>
> http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2005-12/msg00072.html
>
> OK to commit?
>
> -=# Paul #=-
>
> On Friday 02 December 2005 12:32, Kevin Buettner wrote:
> > On Fri, 2 Dec 2005 11:20:22 -0800
> > Paul Gilliam <pgilliam@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > > * rs6000-tdep.c: Add new subroutine, 'rs6000_in_function_epilogue_p()'
> > > and put it into the architecture vector.
> >
> > Your patch is okay to commit after you address Mark's concerns.
> >
> > Kevin
> >
> >
>
>
>