This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [hppa-hpux] Core file support for hppa64-hp-hpux11.11


> Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 20:26:06 +0800
> From: Randolph Chung <randolph@tausq.org>
> 
> Together with http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2005-11/msg00269.html, 
> the following patch adds support for corefiles to hppa64-hp-hpux11.11. 
> This should fix corefiles/2026
> 
> I'll check this in once the bfd bits are approved.
> 
> 2005-11-17  Randolph Chung  <tausq@debian.org>
> 
> 	PR corefiles/2026
> 	* hppa-hpux-tdep.c (hppa_hpux_core_osabi_sniffer): Recognize core 
> 	files generated by hppa64-hp-hpux*
> 	(_initialize_hppa_hpux_tdep): Likewise.
> 
> Index: hppa-hpux-tdep.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/hppa-hpux-tdep.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.43
> diff -u -p -r1.43 hppa-hpux-tdep.c
> --- hppa-hpux-tdep.c	29 Oct 2005 21:31:45 -0000	1.43
> +++ hppa-hpux-tdep.c	17 Nov 2005 12:18:56 -0000
> @@ -2055,6 +2064,8 @@ hppa_hpux_core_osabi_sniffer (bfd *abfd)
>  {
>    if (strcmp (bfd_get_target (abfd), "hpux-core") == 0)
>      return GDB_OSABI_HPUX_SOM;
> +  else if (strcmp (bfd_get_target (abfd), "elf64-hppa") == 0)
> +    return GDB_OSABI_HPUX_ELF;

Don't think this is right.  Is it needed at all?  If it is, then we
should try to do this differently.  The mere fact that the BFD target
is elf64-hppa doesn't imply that this is a HP-UX ELF core file does it?

Mark


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]