This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH] Hooks still needed for annotations
> > > Also, I think it's reasonable to say that GDB should have a parser that
> > > FE's can use. The only way to have a parser that can be tested properly
> > > is to allow it to be packaged and tested in GDB's testsuite. Otherwise,
> > > if the annotations are removed, FE's like GVD, XXGDB, DDD, KGDB, ...
> > > are either going to "go the way of the bison" or they are going to have
> > > to write code that handles GDB/MI. Do we really want 5-10 GDB/MI
> > > parser's out there (each with there own bugs)?
> >
> > This is also unrelated to the removal of annotations.
>
> I think that this could be related (although not a prerequisite) to the
> removal of annotations. Only in the sense that the annotations should
> stay until GDB/MI is fully mature. I do see your point though, I just
> have different motivations than you (I think).
AFAIK the other frontends just use the one annotation, through the option
-fullname or -annotate=1.
Nick