This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [commit] Use bfd_byte in value.h
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
- To: Andrew Cagney <cagney at gnu dot org>
- Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>, mark dot kettenis at xs4all dot nl,gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Tue, 3 May 2005 16:00:31 -0400
- Subject: Re: [commit] Use bfd_byte in value.h
- References: <42710E90.3030300@gnu.org> <200504281919.j3SJJKF1011501@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <42715EE8.5070704@gnu.org> <01c54c8a$Blat.v2.4$ffbe8140@zahav.net.il> <42753958.70109@gnu.org> <01c54e92$Blat.v2.4$5cf24460@zahav.net.il> <42755FD4.8000009@gnu.org>
On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 07:01:40PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> The suggestion of gdb_byte was yours, so it rightfully falls to you to
> propose more formally on gdb@ (I certaintly don't want to jump in and
> steal your thunder). Can we finally do that?
>
> BTW, just like with value.[hc], I've been careful to only make the
> straight forward change for buffers of s/{unsigned,}char/bfd_byte/, and
> have tried to avoid more contraversial replacements such as
> s/void*/bfd_byte*/. We're hardly going to revert the existing bfd_byte
> changes.
Despite the fact that Mark _asked_ you to revert your last patch (which
you've ignored)?
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC