This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [patch] test for altivec h/w on PowerPC
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
- To: Paul Gilliam <pgilliam at us dot ibm dot com>, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2005 15:47:16 -0400
- Subject: Re: [patch] test for altivec h/w on PowerPC
- References: <200503011519.39739.pgilliam@us.ibm.com> <200503021346.35253.pgilliam@us.ibm.com> <20050303172642.GB18681@nevyn.them.org> <200503091638.16585.pgilliam@us.ibm.com> <20050329204449.GC20646@nevyn.them.org>
On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 03:44:49PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 04:38:16PM -0800, Paul Gilliam wrote:
> > Ok, I have made all the requested chanages and tested it on powerpc with and with out altivec.
> >
> > NOTE: this patch depends on a previous patch so that gdb.arch/altivec-*.exp can compile their test programs. The previous patch is here:
> > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2005-03/msg00157.html
> >
> > 2005-03-09 Paul Gilliam <pgilliam@us.ibm.com>
> >
> > * lib/gdb.exp: New proc 'skip_altivec_tests'
> > * gdb.arch/altivec-abi.exp, gdb.arch/altivec-regs.exp: Use the new proc.
>
> OK. Some more adjustment may be needed but let's wait and see.
Paul, you may have missed these approvals. Going to commit these
patches?
BTW, please use the ChangeLog I suggested earlier in this thread; the
above is wrong.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC