Re: i18n, part 2

[Baurjan Ismagulov <ibr at ata dot cs dot hun dot edu dot tr>]

On Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 11:34:10PM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> We discussed cases like this before, I believe.

That is why I asked about it in
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2004-12/msg00119.html .


> Perhaps we should take this opportunity to change "Illegal" to
> "Invalid" here (and elsewhere in your patch), to follow the GNU coding
> standards.

Modified.


With kind regards,
Baurjan.


2004-12-04  Baurjan Ismagulov  <ibr@ata.cs.hun.edu.tr>

	* ada-valprint.c, aix-thread.c, alpha-nat.c, alphabsd-nat.c,
	alphanbsd-tdep.c, amd64-linux-nat.c, amd64-tdep.c,
	amd64bsd-nat.c, amd64fbsd-nat.c, arch-utils.c, arm-linux-nat.c,
	arm-tdep.c, armnbsd-nat.c, armnbsd-tdep.c, auxv.c, avr-tdep.c:
	i18n markup.

Attachment: gdb-ibr-i18n-02-20041206-0046.diff
Description: Text document