This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [patch] New test for set backtrace related functionality
- From: Paul Gilliam <pgilliam at us dot ibm dot com>
- To: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Cc: Michael Chastain <mec dot gnu at mindspring dot com>
- Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2004 13:58:41 -0700
- Subject: Re: [patch] New test for set backtrace related functionality
- References: <200410141539.22560.pgilliam@us.ibm.com> <41798044.nailDG51QLXJD@mindspring.com> <200410261151.42140.pgilliam@us.ibm.com>
- Reply-to: pgilliam at us dot ibm dot com
Michael,
I'ts been two weeks. Please OK this so I can look good on my review 8-)
-=# Paul #=-
On Tuesday 26 October 2004 11:51, Paul Gilliam wrote:
> Michael,
>
> Here is the latest version of the patch. Sorry I didn't get it turned
> around yesterday.
>
> I make a little chage to your suggested test names:
>
> On Friday 22 October 2004 14:48, Michael Chastain wrote:
> > How about:
> >
> > set test "set backtrace"
> > set test "full backtrace, ignore extra"
> > set test "full backtrace, exact"
> > set test "partial backtrace, with argument"
> > set test "partial backtrace, with limit"
>
> set test "partial backtrace, via argument"
> set test "partial backtrace, via limit"
>
> I think "via" is better here than "with", but "using" would work well also.
>
> I have attached the new files.
>
> -=# Paul #=-