This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: : Re: [RFA] Setting long long bitfields


Paul Hilfinger <hilfingr@EECS.Berkeley.EDU> writes:

> Oops, sorry: I got the problematic case backwards.  The problem is
> that a bitsize of 0 is legal, and that causes the result of your 
> suggested tweak to be officially undefined.

How can bitsize ever become zero?  Note that the original code contains a
shift by bitsize - 1, which is undefined as well in this case.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux AG, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]