This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
This patch is approved.
I had wondered about that technique of bigcore.exp, it surprised me a bit when I saw that it was making two runs of the inferior.
Is this ok? I just wonder if it should be generalized and moved to gdb.exp, I guess that should be a separate pass.
I don't know exactly what "it" is referring to, but a separate pass for moving "it" to gdb.exp sounds good to me.
I like what corefile.exp tries to do. It creates a unique subdirectory and runs the target program in the subdirectory so that the core file is easy to find. It suffers from build != host problems though.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |