This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFC] Suggested ways to remove the need for xm-go32.h

From: Michael Chastain <mec dot gnu at mindspring dot com>
To: kettenis at gnu dot org, eliz at gnu dot org
Cc: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 16:21:24 -0400
Subject: Re: [RFC] Suggested ways to remove the need for xm-go32.h
References: <01c49d82$Blat.v2.2.2$23875ec0@zahav.net.il><200409191144.i8JBiSA7045711@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl><01c49ec2$Blat.v2.2.2$834381e0@zahav.net.il>

"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
> I think it's a really rare case that a system has an ISO compiler, but
> a non-ISO library (last time I saw such a system was back in 1994: it
> was a SunOS 4.3 box where I installed GCC).  Nowadays an ISO compiler
> goes with an ISO library, and "rb" and friends were mandated by C89,
> not the latest C9x.

"rb" and "wb" are mentioned in "man fopen" on these systems:

  alphaev56-dec-osf4.0g
  alphaev68-dec-osf5.1b
  hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.00
  hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11

I'm cool with the wrapper-function idea.

Michael

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC] Suggested ways to remove the need for xm-go32.h
  - From: Eli Zaretskii

References:
- [RFC] Suggested ways to remove the need for xm-go32.h
  - From: Eli Zaretskii
- Re: [RFC] Suggested ways to remove the need for xm-go32.h
  - From: Mark Kettenis
- Re: [RFC] Suggested ways to remove the need for xm-go32.h
  - From: Eli Zaretskii

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]