This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [patch/rfc] Eliminate TARGET_HAS_HARDWARE_WATCHPOINTS

> Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 12:09:18 -0400
> From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
> Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
> 
> > That doesn't matter: you still did something unilaterally instead of
> > first asking if that is okay with me and others.
> 
> Can you please provide a technical objection for the patch I committed. 

My point was procedural, not technical.

This discussion identified a disagreement.  When there is a
disagreement, it is customary to ask for explicit approval to
compromise solutions before implementing them, even if you are sure
such an approval will be given.  If nothing else, this encourages
cooperation and the will to reach an agreement in the future.
Unilateral actions, OTOH, have the reverse effect.
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]