This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFA] x86 - jump instruction after the prologue
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
- To: Mark Kettenis <kettenis at chello dot nl>
- Cc: guitton at act-europe dot fr, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com,mec dot gnu at mindspring dot com
- Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2004 18:15:24 -0400
- Subject: Re: [RFA] x86 - jump instruction after the prologue
- References: <20040419173249.GA22201@act-europe.fr> <20040427163725.GA7319@act-europe.fr> <200404291624.i3TGO7PP003462@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> <20040510202721.GB15632@nevyn.them.org> <20040512113101.GA1996@act-europe.fr> <20040808213614.GA20400@nevyn.them.org> <200408082206.i78M6M3u049551@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org>
On Mon, Aug 09, 2004 at 12:06:22AM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2004 17:36:15 -0400
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
>
> On Wed, May 12, 2004 at 01:31:01PM +0200, Jerome Guitton wrote:
> > Daniel Jacobowitz (drow@false.org):
> >
> > > Also, should we write i386-prologue.c in assembly to avoid this
> > > problem? That's what Fred did for SH to avoid a similar difficulty.
> >
> > Can't we compile this file without debug info?
>
> Yes indeed, and that fixes it.
>
> [snip]
>
> In the mean time, this is a test of a prologue analyzer. Compiling it
> without debug information seems reasonable to me. Tested on
> i686-pc-linux-gnu, OK?
>
> Tested on i386-unknown-freebsd4.7 (which uses stabs). Works fine, so
> yes OK. Thanks for looking into this.
Thanks to both of you; checked in.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz