This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: Did the fix for recycled thread ids uncover another bug?
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 03:57:57PM -0700, Paul Gilliam wrote:
Forgive me if this is not the place to post this. It's kind of a
follow-up to
a thread that was here a few months ago.
If I set a breakpoint in a thread function, then when that breakpoint is
hit,
things go bad. If instead of a breakpoint, I hit cntl-c while the thread
function is active, things work right.
I have seen this on Intel and ppc. (The Intel was recent, but not
current.
The ppc was current).
The strange thing is that the bug shows up on 32-bit ppc, but not 64-bit
ppc.
I will post a follow-up with the details if someone tells me this is the
right
mail-list.
You should probably use gdb@ instead.
If you do, would you please include me in the Cc: list?
I'm sort of a semi-active threads maintainer. I'm curious
about the details of how "things go bad".
Michael