This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Did the fix for recycled thread ids uncover another bug?


On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 03:57:57PM -0700, Paul Gilliam wrote:
> Forgive me if this is not the place to post this.  It's kind of a 
> follow-up to
> a thread that was here a few months ago.
> 
> If I set a breakpoint in a thread function, then when that breakpoint is 
> hit,
> things go bad.  If instead of a breakpoint, I hit cntl-c while the thread
> function is active, things work right.
> 
> I have seen this on Intel and ppc.  (The Intel was recent, but not 
> current.
> The ppc was current).
> 
> The strange thing is that the bug shows up on 32-bit ppc, but not 64-bit 
> ppc.
> 
> I will post a follow-up with the details if someone tells me this is the 
> right
> mail-list.

You should probably use gdb@ instead.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]