This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: top-level removal of dejagnu, expect


I'm not sure why you think moving to one copy of the FSF dejagnu
> sources will disturb that.


I was concerned about the toplevel build support, not the dejagnu sources. The toplevel makefile/configure can deal with dejagnu being there or not, I see no need to remove such support.


The obvious reason to remove such support is to reduce the amount of
stuff to maintain.  If having top-level build support for expect and
dejagnu is important to Red Hat, can't Red Hat maintain local patches?

If a group need such local changes then it is personally reasonable to expect that group to maintain them locally.


Andrew



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]