This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFA]: Turn on Ada support


> From: Paul Hilfinger <hilfingr@gnat.com>
> Date: Wed,  9 Jun 2004 05:23:55 -0400 (EDT)
> > 
> > What else can B be in this context?
> 
> A function name.  I take it "function or file @var{B}" is too terse for you?

No, I simply missed that, sorry.

> > This should say "as of @value{GDBN} version X.YY".  A year or two from
> > now, someone will have hard time updating this verbiage given the
> > changes in Ada support.
>  
> OK, but I am not sure what editorial comment you are implying with the
> word "verbiage" (:->).

A bad way to say "wording"... ;-)

> > > +The type of the @t{'Address} attribute may not be @t{System.Address}.
> > 
> > I think you should use @code instead of @t in this and similar cases.
> 
> Umph.  The problem is that @code{'Address} generates `'Address' in Info files,
> which looks odd.

That's true, but isn't that a problem in all Ada-related
documentation?


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]