This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFA]: Turn on Ada support
> From: Paul Hilfinger <hilfingr@gnat.com>
> Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 05:23:55 -0400 (EDT)
> >
> > What else can B be in this context?
>
> A function name. I take it "function or file @var{B}" is too terse for you?
No, I simply missed that, sorry.
> > This should say "as of @value{GDBN} version X.YY". A year or two from
> > now, someone will have hard time updating this verbiage given the
> > changes in Ada support.
>
> OK, but I am not sure what editorial comment you are implying with the
> word "verbiage" (:->).
A bad way to say "wording"... ;-)
> > > +The type of the @t{'Address} attribute may not be @t{System.Address}.
> >
> > I think you should use @code instead of @t in this and similar cases.
>
> Umph. The problem is that @code{'Address} generates `'Address' in Info files,
> which looks odd.
That's true, but isn't that a problem in all Ada-related
documentation?