This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [patch/rfc] mark structs2.exp tests as kfail on hppa


> Should i mark the test as kfailed? I don't know what's the "common
> practice" for marking gcc bugs in gdb test cases...

"KFAIL" means known failure inside gdb.
"XFAIL" means expected failure in something outside gdb (like gcc).

So these would be XFAIL's.  setup_xfail has a three-argument form
so you can say "setup_xfail hppa-*-* gcc/15860".

And if you wanna be real fussy:

  if { [ test_compiler_info gcc-*-* ] } then {
    setup_xfail hppa-*-* gcc/15860
  }

Michael C


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]