This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [patch/rfc] mark structs2.exp tests as kfail on hppa
- From: mec dot gnu at mindspring dot com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain)
- To: randolph at tausq dot org
- Cc: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2004 14:58:16 -0400 (EDT)
- Subject: Re: [patch/rfc] mark structs2.exp tests as kfail on hppa
> Should i mark the test as kfailed? I don't know what's the "common
> practice" for marking gcc bugs in gdb test cases...
"KFAIL" means known failure inside gdb.
"XFAIL" means expected failure in something outside gdb (like gcc).
So these would be XFAIL's. setup_xfail has a three-argument form
so you can say "setup_xfail hppa-*-* gcc/15860".
And if you wanna be real fussy:
if { [ test_compiler_info gcc-*-* ] } then {
setup_xfail hppa-*-* gcc/15860
}
Michael C