Re: [RFA/RFC] New command: ``start''

[Joel Brobecker <brobecker at gnat dot com>]

> Okay, this is much more clear now.  Perhaps it would be useful to
> mention the term ``startup code'' there?

Sure.

> It's much better, thanks.  However, I understand that the same
> arguments will be reused later if the user invokes "run", is that
> true?  If so, I think we should mention that.

That's correct. I added a small sentence explaining this. I agree,
I was trying to imply this by saying that we call "run" underneath,
but that's much clearer that way:

    Note that the same arguments will be reused if no argument
    is provided during subsequent calls to @samp{start} or @samp{run}.

> > +@table @code
> > +@kindex start
> 
> I think an additional index entry here saying
> 
>   @cindex run to main procedure

Added.

> Otherwise, the documentation patch is approved; thanks.

Thanks! Attached is the latest version of the patch.

-- 
Joel

Attachment: start_doc.diff
Description: Text document