This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFA/dwarf] Eliminate dwarf2_tmp_obstack


Daniel Jacobowitz writes:
> That's OK, you're right on all counts anyway.  The bug does not render
> GCC 2.95 code undebuggable; it just interferes with prologue skipping
> and setting breakpoints on the first line of functions, in some cases. 
> Both of which are testsuite is heavily biased towards.

Ummm, just to be clear, you're not about to make the test results worse
with gcc 2.95.3, are you?

BTW, gcc 2.95.3 on native i686-pc-linux-gnu does indeed default to
stabs+, but who knows what the default is on various distros.  And here
is a quick list of some gcc-2 based distros: freebsd 4, netbsd 1.6,
openbsd 3.4, debian 3.0, vine 2.6, gnoppix 0.6, lindows 4.5,
lycoris build3.

My personal estimate/opinion is that gdb HEAD can drop support for gcc 2
some time around October 2005.

Michael C


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]