This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [patch/rfc] frame_id_unwind
- From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at elta dot co dot il>
- To: Jim Blandy <jimb at redhat dot com>
- Cc: cagney at gnu dot org, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: 29 Mar 2004 08:48:00 +0200
- Subject: Re: [patch/rfc] frame_id_unwind
- References: <4062EBF9.7040908@gnu.org> <vt24qs8n8gz.fsf@zenia.home>
- Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
> From: Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>
> Date: 28 Mar 2004 13:15:56 -0500
>
> Wouldn't things work better if we moved the decision about where to
> stop displaying the stack into user interface code (I don't know if
> there's any place shared by cli and mi, but perhaps one could be
> created), and left get_prev_frame as a pure stack-traversal function?
Yes, I think it would be a good idea to separate the decision of
whether to display a frame from the code that traverses the funcall
stack.