This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [patch/rfc] Add meaningful section titles to PROBLEMS
- From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz at elta dot co dot il>
- To: Andrew Cagney <cagney at gnu dot org>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 17:30:49 +0200
- Subject: Re: [patch/rfc] Add meaningful section titles to PROBLEMS
- References: <405B1CE3.2070007@gnu.org>
- Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at elta dot co dot il>
> Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 11:16:35 -0500
> From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
>
> This patch gets rid of the meaningless(1) "Regressions since X.X" titles
> replacing them with functional section titles:
>
> *** C++ support
>
> *** Stack backtraces
>
> *** Misc
>
> (I think that's all) The file is re-ordered but none of the contents
> change.
>
> comments?
Fine with me.
> In terms of content, I think any "problem" that is there for more than
> one full release cycle should be documented
Why not document them when we cut the release branch, if we decide
that this particular problem is not going to be fixed in that release?
Why wait for another release?