This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [rfa/doco] PROBLEMS: add regressions since gdb 6.0
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
- To: Andrew Cagney <cagney at gnu dot org>
- Cc: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec dot gnu at mindspring dot com>, eliz at elta dot co dot il,gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 19:27:01 -0500
- Subject: Re: [rfa/doco] PROBLEMS: add regressions since gdb 6.0
- References: <20040318162402.A32E34B104@berman.michael-chastain.com> <4059FC60.2090605@gnu.org>
On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 02:45:36PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> > Now we don't get any. And for each user that takes
> > the trouble to e-mail us, there are many more users who run into the
> > issue and appreciate having a short description of it.
> >I think we should keep that part of PROBLEMS as long as gdb has this
> >problem.
>
> Definitly no.
What do we gain by removing something that continues to be a major
problem from the file named PROBLEMS? I just don't get it.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer