This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
[commit] change testsuite reference from PR 826 to 1588
- From: David Carlton <carlton at kealia dot com>
- To: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Cc: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec dot gnu at mindspring dot com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 12:13:04 -0800
- Subject: [commit] change testsuite reference from PR 826 to 1588
As discussed in another e-mail thread, I've filed PR gdb/1588 to more
closely match a particular failure in classes.exp; this updates
classes.exp accordingly.
David Carlton
carlton@kealia.com
2004-03-17 David Carlton <carlton@kealia.com>
* gdb.cp/classes.exp (test_enums): Refer to PR c++/1588 instead of
PR c++/826.
Index: classes.exp
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/classes.exp,v
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -p -r1.9 classes.exp
--- classes.exp 9 Mar 2004 17:34:39 -0000 1.9
+++ classes.exp 17 Mar 2004 20:10:24 -0000
@@ -703,7 +703,7 @@ proc test_enums {} {
}
# I'll do this test two different ways, because of a parser bug.
- # See PR gdb/826.
+ # See PR gdb/1588.
gdb_test_multiple "print (ClassWithEnum::PrivEnum) 42" "print (ClassWithEnum::PrivEnum) 42" {
-re "\\$\[0-9\]+ = yellow$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
@@ -712,7 +712,7 @@ proc test_enums {} {
-re "A (parse|syntax) error in expression, near `42'.$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
# "parse error" is bison 1.35.
# "syntax error" is bison 1.875.
- kfail "gdb/826" "print (ClassWithEnum::PrivEnum) 42"
+ kfail "gdb/1588" "print (ClassWithEnum::PrivEnum) 42"
}
}