This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[commit] change testsuite reference from PR 826 to 1588


As discussed in another e-mail thread, I've filed PR gdb/1588 to more
closely match a particular failure in classes.exp; this updates
classes.exp accordingly.

David Carlton
carlton@kealia.com

2004-03-17  David Carlton  <carlton@kealia.com>

	* gdb.cp/classes.exp (test_enums): Refer to PR c++/1588 instead of
	PR c++/826.

Index: classes.exp
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/classes.exp,v
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -p -r1.9 classes.exp
--- classes.exp	9 Mar 2004 17:34:39 -0000	1.9
+++ classes.exp	17 Mar 2004 20:10:24 -0000
@@ -703,7 +703,7 @@ proc test_enums {} {
     }
 
     # I'll do this test two different ways, because of a parser bug.
-    # See PR gdb/826.
+    # See PR gdb/1588.
 
     gdb_test_multiple "print (ClassWithEnum::PrivEnum) 42" "print (ClassWithEnum::PrivEnum) 42" {
 	-re "\\$\[0-9\]+ = yellow$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
@@ -712,7 +712,7 @@ proc test_enums {} {
 	-re "A (parse|syntax) error in expression, near `42'.$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
 	    # "parse error" is bison 1.35.
 	    # "syntax error" is bison 1.875.
-	    kfail "gdb/826" "print (ClassWithEnum::PrivEnum) 42"
+	    kfail "gdb/1588" "print (ClassWithEnum::PrivEnum) 42"
 	}
     }
 


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]