This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [rfa/doco] PROBLEMS: add regressions since gdb 6.0
- From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz at elta dot co dot il>
- To: David Carlton <carlton at kealia dot com>
- Cc: mec dot gnu at mindspring dot com, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 21:05:00 +0200
- Subject: Re: [rfa/doco] PROBLEMS: add regressions since gdb 6.0
- References: <20040317015343.3DA244B104@berman.michael-chastain.com> <yf2ptbbz90k.fsf@hawaii.kealia.com>
- Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at elta dot co dot il>
> From: David Carlton <carlton@kealia.com>
> Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 09:19:23 -0800
>
> While we're updating PROBLEMS, is the list of targets that don't use
> the new frame code accurate? (Sparc, mips, ppc, arm.)
Do users care? What user-level effect will one see on those targets
that don't use the new frame code?
IMHO, if there are no user-level issues, we shouldn't mention this in
PROBLEMS.