This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [rfa/doco] PROBLEMS: add regressions since gdb 6.0
- From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at elta dot co dot il>
- To: mec dot gnu at mindspring dot com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain)
- Cc: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: 17 Mar 2004 08:18:33 +0200
- Subject: Re: [rfa/doco] PROBLEMS: add regressions since gdb 6.0
- References: <20040317015343.3DA244B104@berman.michael-chastain.com>
- Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at elta dot co dot il>
> Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 20:53:43 -0500 (EST)
> From: mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain)
>
> I would like to commit this to both gdb HEAD and gdb gdb_6_1-branch.
>
> Okay to commit to HEAD?
> Okay to commit to the branch?
Okay with me, but...
> * PROBLEMS: Add section headers, "Regressions since gdb 6.0"
> and "Regressions since gdb 5.3.". Add all the regressions
> I know about since gdb 6.0.
The last sentence should probably say "Add known regressions since
gdb 6.0." ``regressions I know about'' is not something that should
be in a ChangeLog; it goes without saying that ``known'' means
``known to the person who makes the change.''
> + We currently don't have any canonical way to output names of C++ types.
> + E.g. "const char *" versus "char const *"; more subtleties aries when
^^^^^
A typo.