This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Yes, the inner "i" should be in scope. That line, which hasn't yet beenexecuted, will destory the inner block. I think that is covered by the GCC-O0 rule?
If that's right, it sounds like we should be using the address-in-block hack to figure out what local variables are in scope for the top frame. But that runs the risk of, for instance, moving us back into a preceeding function.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |