This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [rfa/target/doc] Print less with "set debug target 1"
- From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz at elta dot co dot il>
- To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com, cagney at gnu dot org
- Date: Sun, 07 Mar 2004 07:37:39 +0200
- Subject: Re: [rfa/target/doc] Print less with "set debug target 1"
- References: <20040306230834.GA9343@nevyn.them.org>
- Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at elta dot co dot il>
> Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2004 18:08:35 -0500
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
>
> Seem OK?
Thanks for the documentation patch, but I have 2 minor comments:
> @item set debug target
> Turns on or off display of @value{GDBN} target debugging info. This info
> includes what is going on at the target level of GDB, as it happens. The
> -default is off.
> +default is 0. Set it to 1 to track events, and to 2 to also track the
> +value of large memory transfers. This flag must be set before connecting
> +to the target or saying @code{run}.
. I'm not sure I understand this sentence--do you mean to say that
_if_ the flag is set, it must be set _before_ connecting and
before "run"? If so, I suggest to use @emph and/or @strong to
make sure the reader understands you, and maybe rephrase slightly
to make sure the wording is less ambiguous.
. Since in this context "run" is something the user types, it
should be @kbd{run}, not @code{run}.
Otherwise, it is okay to go in.