This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: remote debugging a multi-threaded program with signal
>>>>> On Fri, 05 Mar 2004 11:27:22 +0900 (JST), Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> said:
anemo> How about when verbose-resume was disabled or unavailable? If
anemo> verbose-resume is necessary to continue with signal, gdb can
anemo> warn it for users? Or gdbserver can resume all threads on this
anemo> case?
For gdb without verbose-resume, how about this patch? With this
patch, gdbserver uses general_thread instead of all_threads.head if
'CNN' packet was sent without preceding 'HcNN'.
--- gdb-6.0.90.org/gdb/gdbserver/target.c Wed Jun 12 02:32:40 2002
+++ gdb-6.0.90/gdb/gdbserver/target.c Sat Mar 6 01:29:44 2004
@@ -49,6 +49,10 @@ set_desired_inferior (int use_general)
if (found == NULL)
found = (struct thread_info *) find_inferior_id (&all_threads,
cont_thread);
+ /* failsafe: use thread in last resume_reply */
+ if (found == NULL)
+ found = (struct thread_info *) find_inferior_id (&all_threads,
+ general_thread);
}
if (found == NULL)
---
Atsushi Nemoto