Re: [rfa] pc bounds checking and namespaces

[Andrew Cagney <cagney at gnu dot org>]

> Elena Zannoni writes:
>
> > Again, a sanity check with 2.95 and -gdwarf-2 would be good.
>
>
> I'm about to add carlton_dictionary-branch and drow-cplus-branch
> to my test bed.  That ought to help.
>
> Instead of finding these problems at the point of merging
> the branches onto HEAD, how about if we fix the branches so that
> they have zero regressions versus gdb 6.0, and then merge the
> branches?

There's a trade off.  Being able to push a button and get back test 
results (or see them posted) for relevant cases will be very helpful, I 
think we need to be careful to avoid introducing absolute criteria such 
as zero regressions.  After all the branch is there largely to explore a 
specific idea and not for major long term development.

enjoy,
Andrew