This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: RFA: Breakpoint infrastructure cleanups [0/8]
- From: Michael Snyder <msnyder at redhat dot com>
- To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>
- Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at elta dot co dot il>, Andrew Cagney <cagney at gnu dot org>, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 11:57:33 -0800
- Subject: Re: RFA: Breakpoint infrastructure cleanups [0/8]
- Organization: Red Hat, Inc.
- References: <20031008165534.GA8718@nevyn.them.org> <3F92B3E5.8010209@gnu.org> <9003-Sun19Oct2003183420+0200-eliz@elta.co.il> <20031030054922.GA7434@nevyn.them.org>
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
Does anyone disagree with the "breakpoint" and "location" convention
for now? Michael, with the change from impl_breakpoint to bp_location,
are the patches I posted OK? Just let me know if you'd like me to
update and repost them first.
Based on my following of the discussion, I'm happy to give a
'rubber stamp' approval -- but I probably should have mentioned
earlier (it slipped my mind as well) that I stepped down as
maintainer of breakpoints back in March of this year.
Maybe I better go edit the maintainers list. ;-/
Michael