This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [rfa/6.0] Better handle unspecified CFI values

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 12:47:54 -0700
Subject: Re: [rfa/6.0] Better handle unspecified CFI values
References: <3F593115.4030407@redhat.com> <20030906213351.GA1101@nevyn.them.org> <3F5D1AE7.7020306@redhat.com> <20030909033053.GA8904@nevyn.them.org>

On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 11:30:53PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> We can only compute expressions
> describing a memory location where the register is saved, not computed
> values.

False.  See DW_CFA_expression.


r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [rfa/6.0] Better handle unspecified CFI values
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

References:
- [rfa/6.0] Better handle unspecified CFI values
  - From: Andrew Cagney
- Re: [rfa/6.0] Better handle unspecified CFI values
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: [rfa/6.0] Better handle unspecified CFI values
  - From: Andrew Cagney
- Re: [rfa/6.0] Better handle unspecified CFI values
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]