Re: Powerpc and software single step

[Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at redhat dot com>]

> I do not see a way to assign this function pointer off of the set
> > command, unless there is a some trick I did not see.
> > maybe we could fix this with more code, but sadly I'm limited in my
> > ability to push out patches under the current circumstances.
> >
> > But all of these solutions are not the real one which probably takes
> > more commitment then available (at least from me at the moment ;-)
>
>
> set_gdbarch_software_single_step?  You couldn't do it
> architecture-independently, perhaps.

That would be wrong.  An architecture vector should not change 
underneath GDB's feet.

It may be possible to wrap software single step's predicate in a 
function that, like the remote protocol, returns the predicate, or 
always false.

Andrew