This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFA] linux-proc: use lwp instead of merged_pid in gcore files.


J. Johnston wrote:
J. Johnston wrote:



Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:

On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 05:11:38PM -0700, Michael Snyder wrote:

Jeff, here's a patch that accomplishes the same thing as yours,
using mostly existing code and data.  I have tested it on old
linux threads, but not on nptl threads.

Daniel, I went with your suggestion for "linux-nat.h", and I
moved one declaration from config/nm-linux.h to the new file.




I'm not sure who's approval you're waiting for, but this looks might
good to me.  Let's have someone with NPTL installed confirm it...


Will do.


Oh, one nit. Create $(linux_nat_h) in Makefile.in, please.

[I'll switch to using linux-nat.h before committing the fork patch,
once it's approved.  I'm not going to repost it now though.]




Tests run on x86 RH9.


=== gdb Summary ===

# of expected passes        8988
# of unexpected failures    35
# of unexpected successes    2
# of expected failures        47
# of known failures        31
# of unresolved testcases    1
# of unsupported tests        2


the gdb.threads/gcore-thread.exp testcase ran successfully.

I'll take that as confirmation. Consider this committed (I'll get to it shortly).


There is still a formatting mess for the output which you have already
noticed.

Thanks for verifying that. Shame none of the testsuites caught it... ;-)




Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]