This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
J. Johnston wrote:
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 05:11:38PM -0700, Michael Snyder wrote:
Jeff, here's a patch that accomplishes the same thing as yours, using mostly existing code and data. I have tested it on old linux threads, but not on nptl threads.
Daniel, I went with your suggestion for "linux-nat.h", and I moved one declaration from config/nm-linux.h to the new file.
I'm not sure who's approval you're waiting for, but this looks might good to me. Let's have someone with NPTL installed confirm it...
Will do.
Oh, one nit. Create $(linux_nat_h) in Makefile.in, please.
[I'll switch to using linux-nat.h before committing the fork patch, once it's approved. I'm not going to repost it now though.]
Tests run on x86 RH9.
=== gdb Summary ===
# of expected passes 8988 # of unexpected failures 35 # of unexpected successes 2 # of expected failures 47 # of known failures 31 # of unresolved testcases 1 # of unsupported tests 2
the gdb.threads/gcore-thread.exp testcase ran successfully.
I'll take that as confirmation. Consider this committed (I'll get to it shortly).
There is still a formatting mess for the output which you have already noticed.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |