On Fri, May 30, 2003 at 03:26:28PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
>Here's an updated patch. The more I looked at the "struct type *type"
>argument, the less I understood about how it should be used. I assume it
>would only be used, so far, on i386, but I'm easily confused by stacks and
>registers (and how things are stored there), so any pointers would be
>appreciated.
The patch is almost fine. Change it to `F' instead of `f' - so that a
predicate is also available.
For some background, see: Pointers Are Not Always Addresses
http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/current/onlinedocs/gdbint_9.html#SEC71
The d10v is an example.
Shouldn't TYPE be used? I guess I'm not understanding why you wanted
it to be there...