This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFA] Correct double negative in gdbint.texinfo
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>
- To: "Theodore A. Roth" <troth at openavr dot org>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 16:14:45 -0400
- Subject: Re: [RFA] Correct double negative in gdbint.texinfo
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.53.0305141118050.25620@knuth.amplepower.com>
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 11:26:07AM -0700, Theodore A. Roth wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This patch is strictly a grammar change.
>
> I'm not sure if "need not do anything" or "need do nothing" sounds
> better though.
>
> Ok to commit?
OK as an obvious fix, thanks. I think I prefer "need not do anything".
>
> Ted Roth
> 2003-05-14 Theodore A. Roth <troth@openavr.org>
>
> * doc/gdbint.texinfo: Correct a double negative.
>
> Index: doc/gdbint.texinfo
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/doc/gdbint.texinfo,v
> retrieving revision 1.144
> diff -u -r1.144 gdbint.texinfo
> --- doc/gdbint.texinfo 5 May 2003 17:56:57 -0000 1.144
> +++ doc/gdbint.texinfo 14 May 2003 17:55:56 -0000
> @@ -288,7 +288,7 @@
> breakpoints somehow; for instance, a ROM monitor may do its own
> software breakpoints. So although these are not literally ``hardware
> breakpoints'', from @value{GDBN}'s point of view they work the same;
> -@value{GDBN} need not do nothing more than set the breakpoint and wait
> +@value{GDBN} need not do anything more than set the breakpoint and wait
> for something to happen.
>
> Since they depend on hardware resources, hardware breakpoints may be
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer