This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: crasher in dwarf2loc.c
- From: Michael Snyder <msnyder at redhat dot com>
- To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com, cagney at redhat dot com
- Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 17:18:39 -0700
- Subject: Re: crasher in dwarf2loc.c
- Organization: Red Hat, Inc.
- References: <3EA5E370.F069D062@redhat.com> <20030423021617.GB13849@nevyn.them.org>
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 05:50:56PM -0700, Michael Snyder wrote:
> > Hey Daniel,
> >
> > I've got a core dump coming from dwarf_expr_frame_base.
> > First you call get_frame_function, and then you immediately
> > use its return value. But get_frame_function can return zero,
> > so I think you need to check for zero before using it.
> >
> > Michael
>
> Just to avoid the crash, you're probably right.
>
> > PS: more details: get_frame_block returns zero, because
> > frame_address_in_block returns a pc that is not in any block.
> >
> > The crash occurs while running recurse.exp, when we have a
> > watchpoint on a local variable in an inner frame, and we
> > continue -- so I don't know the exact context; but I'm
> > willing to bet that it is trying to evaluate the local
> > variable after the stack frame has been destroyed.
>
> Huh - we should not even be reaching this code. I don't quite
> understand your explanation; what target does this happen? Can it be
> reproduced on a simulator, or something of that ilk?
mumble, mumble...
[...]
mumble, mumble, mumble...
OK, yes.
But first you have to back out this change: then run recurse.exp.
If it doesn't crash in your target of choice, try h8300-elf (sim).
2003-04-21 Andrew Cagney <cagney at redhat dot com>
* frame.c (frame_id_eq): Fail when the code_addr's do not match.
*************** frame_id_eq (struct frame_id l, struct f
*** 295,304 ****
/* The .stack and .code are identical, the ID's are identical. */
eq = 1;
else
! /* FIXME: cagney/2003-04-06: This should be zero. Can't yet do
! this because most frame ID's are not being initialized
! correctly. */
! eq = 1;
if (frame_debug)
{
fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog, "{ frame_id_eq (l=");
--- 295,302 ----
/* The .stack and .code are identical, the ID's are identical. */
eq = 1;
else
! /* No luck. */
! eq = 0;
if (frame_debug)
{
fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog, "{ frame_id_eq (l=");